Case 2300577/2020 · Employment Tribunal
“ X ” v “ Y “ Preliminary Hearing by telephone on 1 June 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300577/2020
- Decision date
- 1 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
“ X ”
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone before Employment Judge Pritchard on 1 June 2020. The claimant said she was bringing disability discrimination and deductions from wages claims. The respondent denied that the claimant was disabled, denied knowledge of any disability, and resisted the claims generally. The hearing was directed to the claimant's late application to amend the disability discrimination claim.
The tribunal applied the amendment guidance in Selkent Bus Co v Moore and considered the nature of the amendment, statutory time limits, the timing of the application, and the balance of prejudice. It accepted the respondent's submission that no pleaded facts supported a reasonable adjustments claim under section 20 of the Equality Act 2010. It also noted that, for the allegations about denial of the opportunity to complete the capability/probationary plan and dismissal, the amendment was adding a legal label to facts already pleaded rather than introducing a materially different factual case.
The tribunal allowed the amendment in part, so that the relevant paragraphs of the application stood as an amendment to the claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. It refused the proposed reasonable adjustments amendment because it was a new claim, was significantly out of time, and would widen the scope of the enquiry. The tribunal also noted that allowing that claim would deprive the respondent of a limitation defence. No merits decision on the underlying claims and no monetary award are recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Interlocutory amendment ruling, not a merits determination. The tribunal allowed the claimant to amend so as to plead section 15 Equality Act 2010 in relation to allegations that she was denied the opportunity to complete her capability/probationary plan and her employment was terminated, but refused leave to add a section 20 reasonable adjustments claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Selkent Bus Co v Moore
- Abercrombie v Aga Rangemaster Ltd
- British Newspaper Printing Corporation (North) Ltd v Kelly
- Ali v Office of National Statistics
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham v Jesuthasan
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.