Case 2300577/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Jamie Appleton v Astoms Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300577/2022
- Decision date
- 25 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Jamie Appleton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge B Smith sat alone at a remote hearing in London South on 25 November 2022. The respondent did not attend. The judgment records that the claimant, Jamie Appleton, brought claims including unfair dismissal, notice pay, holiday pay, and a redundancy payment.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. The redundancy payment claim was also dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not record substantive findings on those claims beyond the fact of withdrawal.
The tribunal found the notice pay claim well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay £6,730 gross. It also found the holiday pay claim well-founded and ordered £4,845 gross in respect of holiday accrued but not taken or paid on termination of employment.
The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £11,575 gross, comprising the notice pay and holiday pay sums. No separate award components beyond those gross figures are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states: 'The claim for unfair dismissal is dismissed upon withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded as a claim for notice pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £6,730 gross. | Upheld | — | £6,730 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay claim well-founded and ordered £4,845 gross in respect of holiday accrued but not taken or paid on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £4,845 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states: 'The claim for a redundancy payment is dismissed upon withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,575
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.