Case 2300593/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Langer v CNH2016 Ltd (In Liquidation) and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300593/2018
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss A Langer
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis corrected judgment relates only to the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 3 April 2019, the claimant was given notice that an Employment Judge considered the claim to have no reasonable prospect of success for the reasons set out at paragraph 12 of the first respondent's grounds of resistance.
The claimant was told the claim would be struck out unless she made written representations by 17 April 2019 explaining why that should not happen. The judgment records that no written representations were received.
Accordingly, the tribunal struck out the claim against the Secretary of State. No monetary award is recorded in this corrected judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The corrected judgment states that the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy was struck out because it had no reasonable prospect of success and no written representations were received in response to the notice dated 3 April 2019. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.