Case 2300601/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Aderugbo v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300601/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davidson Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Aderugbo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant resigned before a scheduled disciplinary hearing and alleged that the respondent's disciplinary and grievance processes breached the implied term of trust and confidence. He relied on matters including the handling of a cash-shortage investigation, short notice and missing evidence for an initially scheduled disciplinary hearing, the handling of his grievance, the use of a voicemail recording, and the accumulation of disciplinary allegations against him.
The tribunal found flaws in parts of the respondent's procedure, including that the cash-handling investigation was rushed, the planned disciplinary hearing was arranged with undue haste, and further investigation could have been carried out into one workplace incident. However, it found that other matters relied on by the claimant were not procedural flaws and that the respondent had engaged with his grievance, upheld some complaints, and arranged for managers from another region to conduct later stages as he had requested.
The tribunal concluded that the flaws, individually or cumulatively, were not sufficient to amount to a fundamental breach of contract. It found that the claimant resigned because he believed dismissal was likely in light of the allegations and his live final written warning, but that this did not establish constructive dismissal. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes the claim as unfair constructive dismissal based on an alleged breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The tribunal found no fundamental breach and dismissed the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- implied term of trust and confidence
- fundamental breach of contract
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.