Case 2300602/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 2300602/2018
- Decision date
- 12 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Date
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Balogun heard the matter at London South on 7 November 2018, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr G Self, Counsel. The judgment records claims of discrimination arising in consequence of disability, indirect discrimination, and a redundancy payment.
The tribunal stated that those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. No merits findings or monetary award are recorded in the judgment, and the decision is dated 12 November 2018.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim of discrimination arising in consequence of disability. The judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Other | Indirect discrimination claim. The extracted text does not specify the protected characteristic. The judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | Claim for a redundancy payment. The judgment states it was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.