Case 2300604/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Jenkins v United Car Parts Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300604/2018
- Decision date
- 14 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Jenkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 27 September 2019, Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone found that Mrs C Jenkins was an employee of United Car Parts Limited. The judgment records that her employment had TUPE transferred from Motorbitz Limited on 25 January 2016 and that she had the requisite continuity of service to claim unfair dismissal.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's claims were in time. The written record does not record any final determination of liability on the substantive claims or any remedy, and notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record does not determine the merits of the unfair dismissal claim. It records only preliminary findings that the claimant was an employee, that her employment transferred by TUPE from Motorbitz Limited on 25 January 2016, and that she had the requisite continuity of service to bring the claim, together with a finding that the claims were in time. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.