Case 2300605/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Carroll v Medway Builders — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300605/2019
- Decision date
- 15 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Carroll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr J Carroll's claim against Medway Builders. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued. On 25 January 2020, the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal decided that the claim should be struck out. No substantive determination of liability on the underlying employment issues is recorded in this judgment, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 25 January 2020, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out, but he failed to make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.