Case 2300616/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Fagbemi v Carebridge Staffing — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300616/2022
- Decision date
- 9 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Fagbemi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 9 November 2022 at London South conducted by CVP, Employment Judge A.M.S. Green considered Ms K Fagbemi’s claim against Carebridge Staffing for unauthorised deductions from wages. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Hillier, HR Director.
The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim because it was time barred. No substantive determination of the underlying wage deduction complaint was made, and no monetary award was recorded.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. On the extracted record, the only outcome recorded is that the claim was outside time and therefore not entertained on the merits.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages because it was time barred. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.