Case 2300620/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Rajaravi v KZ Catering Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300620/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Rajaravi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was Mr T Rajaravi and the respondent was KZ Catering Limited. On 30 June 2023, Employment Judge Heath recorded that, after the claimant confirmed his employment with the respondent was continuing, the tribunal had issued a strike out warning on 17 May 2023 and then struck out the unfair dismissal claim.
The sole claim identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. The tribunal held that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and therefore struck it out. No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not record any separate monetary findings.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal claim after the claimant confirmed that his employment with the respondent was continuing, following a strike out warning dated 17 May 2023. The claim was held to have no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.