Case 2300628/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. P Schofield v Home Office, Immigration Enforcement, South East Ice. — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300628/2020
- Decision date
- 10 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sage Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. P Schofield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a strike-out decision dated 10 June 2021 by Employment Judge Sage. It states that the claimant, Mr P Schofield, and the respondent, Home Office, Immigration Enforcement, South East Ice, were before the tribunal in case 2300628/2020. The order made was that the claim be struck out.
The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 9 November 2020, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to be actively pursued. The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. The extracted text does not record any merits findings on the underlying dispute and does not identify any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.