Case 2300628/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs F Lee v R & F Properties QS (UK) Co., Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300628/2023
- Decision date
- 26 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Musgrave-Cohen
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr K Murphy, Mrs J Jerram
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs F Lee
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mrs F Lee's complaints of direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 against R & F Properties QS (UK) Co., Ltd. The written judgment record states the liability outcome but does not include the oral reasons given at the hearing, noting instead that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal awarded compensation totalling £91,597.82 for financial loss and injury to feelings. That figure was broken down as a compensatory award for financial loss, inclusive of interest and grossing up, of £61,634.72, and injury to feelings, inclusive of interest and grossing up, of £29,963.10.
The judgment states that the sums are payable directly to the Claimant and must be paid within 28 days of the date of judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant's complaints of direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 were upheld. The written record does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons. | Upheld | Sex | £91,598 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £91,598
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £61,635
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.