Case 2300630/2018 · Employment Tribunal

In person For the v Respondent — 2018

Case reference: 2300630/2018
Decision date: 17 December 2018
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge K Andrews Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

1 named

Claimant

In person For the

Respondent

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a judgment following reconsideration of the earlier decision dated 18 May 2018. Employment Judge K Andrews revoked paragraph 2 of that judgment and replaced it with a revised position on time limits. The tribunal held that any claims for which time started to run at the effective date of termination had been submitted out of time, but that either it was not reasonably practicable for them to have been presented in time or it was just and equitable to allow them to proceed, so time was extended accordingly.

The tribunal did not determine the time issue for any claims where time started to run before the effective date of termination. It said that issue remained open and would be decided by a future tribunal after hearing the relevant evidence. The judge added an observation that it may assist that future tribunal to approach any such issue as if the claim form had been submitted four days before the end of the three-month period after the effective date of termination. No merits decision or monetary award was made in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Judgment following reconsideration only. Paragraph 2 of the 18 May 2018 judgment was revoked; the tribunal held that claims where time started to run at the effective date of termination had been presented out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable for them to have been submitted in time, or alternatively it was just and equitable to allow them to proceed, so time was extended. The issue of time for any claims where time started to run before the effective date of termination was left undetermined for a future tribunal.	Other	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.