Case 2300641/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Archer v Select Services Partner UK Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300641/2019
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Archer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. The respondent applied on 21 September 2020 for strike out on grounds of non-compliance with orders and/or non-pursuit.
On 14 October 2020, Employment Judge Martin wrote to the claimant explaining that the Tribunal was considering striking out the claim for want of active pursuit and invited any objections by 21 October 2020. The claimant did not respond by that date or at all.
In light of the absence of any response, the Tribunal was satisfied that the complaint had not been actively pursued and ordered that the claim be struck out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying legal claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out under Rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.