Case 2300653/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bhatti v Pakistan International Airlines Corporation and 3 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300653/2022
- Decision date
- 14 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ramsden Date
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr J Bhatti
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerned the claimant’s application of 27 October 2023 for reconsideration of the dismissal judgment sent on 14 October 2023 and for reinstatement of the claim. Employment Judge Ramsden refused the application. The judgment records that the claim had been dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 after the claimant withdrew it on 2 August 2023.
The tribunal noted that, at the time of withdrawal, the claimant did not express a wish to reserve the right to bring a further claim. It also found that it was not satisfied that reinstatement would be in the interests of justice, and said the claimant had not demonstrated why justice required reinstatement. The application therefore failed. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for reconsideration and reinstatement was refused. The underlying claim had already been dismissed under Rule 52 after withdrawal on 2 August 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 52 ET Rules
- Rule 71 ET Rules
- interests of justice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.