Case 2300657/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Thompson v Chelsfield Surgery — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300657/2022
- Decision date
- 18 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Wright
- Venue
- London South via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Thompson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mrs S Thompson, brought a claim of unfair dismissal against Chelsfield Surgery. The case was heard by Employment Judge D Wright sitting alone at London South via CVP on 17 and 18 October 2022.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent within the meaning of section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded because the claim failed at liability stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not dismissed by the respondent within the meaning of section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996, so the unfair dismissal claim failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 95(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.