Case 2300660/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Dias v Chandni Chowk Banqueting Hall Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300660/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Dias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hybrid public hearing on 23 March 2021 before Judge Brian Doyle, with Mrs R Dias represented by Mr R Conteh and the respondent not in attendance or represented, the tribunal held that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and non-payment of holiday pay were well-founded and upheld them.
For unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,320, calculated as 8 years at 1.5 weeks per year on a gross weekly pay figure of £360. It also awarded a compensatory award of £7,800, based on 30 weeks' loss of earnings at £300 net per week (£9,000), less £1,700 earned in mitigation and plus £500 for loss of statutory employment rights.
The tribunal further awarded £2,400 for 8 weeks' notice pay on the wrongful dismissal claim and £2,736 for 38 days' unpaid holiday pay at £72 per day. It recorded a 25% uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, shown as £4,314, and stated that the recoupment regulations did not apply. The itemised figures in the award section do not fully reconcile with the uplift base stated in the judgment, but the total ordered was £21,570.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Awarded as unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £2,736 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £4,320 and compensatory award of £7,800 were awarded for unfair dismissal, before the separate uplift recorded in the judgment. | Upheld | — | £12,120 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as 8 weeks' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £21,570
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,320
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £7,800
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.