Case 2300670/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Head v Mrs Sharon Evans t/a Station Road Bakers — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300670/2019
- Decision date
- 7 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Head
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Ashford on 7 October 2019, Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone heard Miss A Head's claims against Mrs Sharon Evans t/a Station Road Bakers. The tribunal recorded that the complaints for notice pay and holiday pay were out of time and dismissed them because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear them.
The claim for unlawful deduction of wages, which concerned pension contributions, was dismissed upon withdrawal after the contributions had been made. No merits finding was made on that complaint.
The claimant succeeded on redundancy pay. The tribunal found that she had the right to a redundancy payment of £4,026.78, calculated as 18 x a week's pay of £223.72, and ordered the respondent to pay £4,026.78 to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The complaint for notice pay was found to be out of time and dismissed because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The complaint for holiday pay was found to be out of time and dismissed because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deduction of wages, relating to pension contributions, was dismissed upon withdrawal after the contributions had been made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had the right to a redundancy payment of £4,026.78, calculated as 18 x a week's pay of £223.72, and ordered the respondent to pay that sum. | Upheld | — | £4,027 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,027
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.