Case 2300675/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Scott Murdoch, Mr James Newton, Mr John Corkhill, Mr Raymond Jenkinson, Mr Scott Murdock, Mr Liam Bell, Mr Paul Briscoe, Mr Gary Brown, Mr Ronald Madine v Interserve Industrial Services Limited Interserve Industrial Services Limited Enigma Industrial Services Limited Enigma Industrial Services Holdings Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300675/2019
- Decision date
- 30 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Scott Murdoch, Mr James Newton, Mr John Corkhill, Mr Raymond Jenkinson, Mr Scott Murdock, Mr Liam Bell, Mr Paul Briscoe, Mr Gary Brown, Mr Ronald Madine
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant, and it does not contain findings on the merits of any pleaded issue.
No liability findings, legal test analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the extracted text. The order is limited to dismissal after withdrawal, so there is no award of compensation or other monetary remedy recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The text does not identify the underlying pleaded cause of action, but the case listing is categorised as Transfer of Undertakings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.