Case 2300678/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Novo Nordisk — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300678/2020
- Decision date
- 16 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by telephone on 16 March 2022 before Employment Judge Balogun. The claimant was Ms G Subramanian and the respondent was Novo Nordisk Limited. The tribunal made a jurisdictional ruling rather than a merits determination.
The tribunal held that all claims apart from the claim for 4 days' holiday pay were dismissed for want of jurisdiction because they were the subject of a settlement agreement between the parties. The extract does not list those other claims individually, but it records that they could not proceed because of the settlement agreement.
The only claim that remained live was the claim for 4 days' holiday pay, which the tribunal said could proceed. No compensation or other monetary award was made in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | All claims apart from the holiday pay issue were dismissed for want of jurisdiction because they were the subject of a settlement agreement between the parties. The judgment does not enumerate those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claim for 4 days' holiday pay was allowed to proceed. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.