Case 2300687/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Sedano v Harris Federation VARIATION OF — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300687/2020
- Decision date
- 15 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Khalil
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Sedano
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a variation of judgment following reconsideration under Rule 70. The tribunal noted that the claimant had applied under Regulation 10A(2) of the Employment Tribunals Regulations 2013 and that the earlier judgment sent on 15 September 2021 was considered afresh and varied because this was necessary in the interests of justice.
The only complaint identified in the judgment was unfair dismissal. On reconsideration, the tribunal recorded that the unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it. No compensatory or other monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that, following reconsideration under Rule 70, the complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed upon the claimant's withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.