Case 2300688/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Smith Miss L Smith Miss R Smith v Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300688/2020
- Decision date
- 7 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Smith Miss L Smith Miss R Smith
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 August 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 9 April 2020 and for failure to actively pursue the claims. The judgment records that the claimants did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge Wright therefore struck out the claims under rule 37. The hearing listed for 22 February 2021 did not take place. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive liability findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive cause(s) of action. It records that the claims in case numbers 2300688/2020, 2300690/2020 and 2300691/2020 were struck out under rule 37 after non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 9/4/2020 and failure to actively pursue the claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.