Case 2300699/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Ally v Abacus Mobility Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300699/2020
- Decision date
- 5 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Ally
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to enter a response to the claim, so the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that Abacus Mobility Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr H Ally's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the gross sum of £720.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not enter a response. Judgment was entered under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | £720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £720
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.