Case 2300734/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J. Williams v Ark Blake Academy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300734/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A. Beale Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J. Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J. Williams, did not attend the hearing at London South Employment Tribunal on 9 February 2022. The respondent was represented by Ms C. Wilson, Senior HR Business Partner.
The Employment Judge, A. Beale, struck out the claim under rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The written record does not identify the underlying cause of action or record any substantive findings on liability.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. The claimant did not attend the hearing; the claim was struck out under rules 37(1)(c) and (d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 37(1)(c) and (d) of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.