Case 2300748/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Paul Carr v DS Smith Paper Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300748/2021
- Decision date
- 13 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Paul Carr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Paul Carr brought a complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages against DS Smith Paper Ltd arising from his work as a Logistics Shunter Loader at Kemsley Mill. He said he had been told at recruitment that he would work a five-shift pattern and around 1,760 hours per year, whereas he said he was in fact working around 2,160 hours per year and should have been paid overtime for the additional hours. The tribunal recorded that he remained in employment, having moved from the Shunter Loader role to a Site Logistics Operator role on 1 November 2020.
The tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that Mr Carr was not told he would work the hours or pattern he alleged. It accepted evidence from Mr Terry Dooley and Mr Glenn Gibson that the Claimant was offered the Shunter role and given the relevant rota information, and it found that the contracts he signed referred him to yearly shift rotas. The tribunal concluded that the rota documents showed a three-shift system, not the five-shift system the Claimant described, and that the yearly rotas and contract terms were consistent with the Respondent’s case.
The tribunal also accepted Mr Justin Hake’s evidence that the site collective agreement had been varied in 2012/13 to remove a 1,760-hour cap for Shunter roles, although there was no written record of that change. It found that the Claimant’s payslips were inaccurate in showing 37.5 hours and later 32.89 hours, but treated that as a source of confusion only and not as evidence of a wage shortfall. On the evidence, it held that the Claimant was paid in accordance with his contract, the yearly rotas, and the collective agreement.
The tribunal held that no unauthorised deduction had been made and that the Claimant had not discharged the burden of showing wages properly payable but unpaid. It also noted that the complaint was time-limited by s.23(4A) ERA 1996 to deductions within the two years ending 20 November 2020. The claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was for alleged unpaid hours / unauthorised deductions from wages. The tribunal held there was no deduction from wages properly payable and dismissed the complaint. It also held that, in any event, the claim was limited by s.23(4A) ERA 1996 to deductions between 20 November 2018 and 20 November 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.23(4A) ERA 1996
- New Century Cleaning Co v Church
- Weatherilt v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.