Case 2300749/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Sidhu v Kaplan Financial Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300749/2020
- Decision date
- 17 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dimbylow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Sidhu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the case was between Mr T Sidhu and Kaplan Financial Ltd and that it was issued as a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. No substantive findings were made on liability, and the text does not identify the underlying causes of action beyond the later listing information.
The tribunal stated that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. There is no merits determination, no findings of fact, and no remedy awarded in the judgment text provided.
The decision is dated 17 August 2020 and is signed by Employment Judge Dimbylow. No lay members are listed, indicating that this was a judge-alone judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying claim type; it states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 withdrawal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.