Case 2300763/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Meighan v Anglian Windows Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300763/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Britton
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Meighan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing heard by CVP on 13 November 2020 before Employment Judge P Britton sitting alone. The tribunal decided that Anglian was the proper respondent and that Ms J Meighan was a worker of Anglian for the purposes of the claim under s 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment did not determine the underlying substantive dispute. Instead, the proceedings were stayed for 28 days so that the parties could confirm whether the claim had been settled via ACAS or whether a hearing was still required. If the claim was to proceed, the tribunal directed that a telephone case management hearing would be listed before the same judge for final directions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary hearing only. The judgment decided that Anglian is the proper respondent and that the claimant was a worker for the purposes of s 230(3)(b) ERA 1996, but it did not determine the substantive wages claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s 230(3)(b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.