Case 2300768/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Sahdhu v Fortel Services Limited Heard — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300768/2020
- Decision date
- 24 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Pritchard Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Sahdhu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Fortel Services Limited breached Mr R Sahdhu's contract of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,088.56 without deductions. The judgment does not set out a further split of the award beyond that single contractual damages figure.
The tribunal also recorded that Mr Sahdhu had been provided with a written statement of employment particulars before the proceedings began. On that basis, it made no award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment and ordered damages of £1,088.56 without deductions. It also recorded that the claimant had already been provided with a written statement of employment particulars before proceedings began, so no award was made under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,089 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,089
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.