Case 2300772/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Besart Etemi v Sheridan Pubs Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300772/2020
- Decision date
- 4 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Besart Etemi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rahman, sitting alone at London South by CVP on 4 December 2020, ordered Sheridan Pubs Ltd to pay Mr Besart Etemi £2,500 for unauthorised deductions under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and £3,328.98 for holiday pay. Both sums were recorded as gross amounts.
The written record also orders a further £50.63, but it does not state what that sum represents. The decision says reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days, so the published record does not include the tribunal's factual or legal reasoning beyond the monetary orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded as unauthorised deductions under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; recorded as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £2,500 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay; recorded as a gross sum. | Upheld | — | £3,329 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,880
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.