Case 2300792/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Beckles, representative For the v Mr Z Mahmood, representative — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300792/2019
- Decision date
- 17 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freer Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Beckles, representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 17 January 2020, Employment Judge Freer determined that Mr B Holt was a disabled person at the material times for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The written judgment records that the reasons for that decision were given orally at the hearing.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment and no substantive liability findings on the underlying discrimination or contract claims are recorded in the text supplied. The decision is limited to the disability-status issue decided at the preliminary hearing stage.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only: the tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person at the material times pursuant to section 6 Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.