Case 2300792/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Harvey, owner — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300792/2021
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Date
- Panel members
- Dr S Chacko, Mr N Shanks
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South hearing on 22 and 23 March 2023, Employment Judge K Andrews sitting with members Dr S Chacko and Mr N Shanks recorded a unanimous decision that all claims failed and were dismissed except for an unlawful deduction from wages claim and a wrongful dismissal claim. The unlawful deduction finding was limited to the claimant's October 2022 wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £975.04 net for the unlawful deduction and £250 gross for unpaid notice pay, payable forthwith. The written record also notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Included in the tribunal's statement that all claims failed except unlawful deductions from wages and wrongful dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction from wages for October 2022; award stated as £975.04 net. | Upheld | — | £975 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded unpaid notice pay of £250 gross. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,225
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.