Case 2300795/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Egborge v Subsea 7 — 2017
- Case reference
- 2300795/2017
- Decision date
- 20 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hildebrand Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Egborge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings in case 2300795/2017 were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. No findings on liability were made, and the text does not record any substantive analysis of the pleaded issues.
The available text does not identify any remedy, compensation, or other monetary award. It also does not record hearing detail, witnesses, or legal tests applied. The only stated procedural outcome is dismissal following withdrawal by Miss E Egborge.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out the merits of the race discrimination allegation. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out the merits of the sex discrimination allegation. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not set out any merits finding on unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.