Case 2300795/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Mohamuud Jimale v Abellio London Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300795/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Panel members
- Miss E Rousou, Mr G Mann
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Mohamuud Jimale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, a PCV bus driver, resigned after the respondent refused to allow him to be accompanied at disciplinary proceedings by John or Francis Neckles of the PTSC Union. The Tribunal found that the operative disciplinary procedure was the July 2018 procedure, that there was no contractual right to be accompanied at investigation or fact-finding meetings, and that the previous examples relied on did not establish a current custom and practice.
The Tribunal found that the claimant was denied his statutory right to be accompanied at the disciplinary hearing on 12 November 2018 because his chosen companions fell within the statutory categories and the worker's choice did not have to be reasonable. That section 10 complaint succeeded for the 12 November hearing only, with remedy to be determined separately.
The constructive unfair dismissal claim failed because the Tribunal found no repudiatory breach of contract or breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. It found that the respondent had reasonable and proper cause to refuse accompaniment by the Neckles brothers, offered the claimant an opportunity to find alternative representation, and that the claimant resigned rather than being dismissed. The section 12 detriment and dismissal complaints and wrongful dismissal complaint were also dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was advanced as constructive unfair dismissal. The Tribunal found that the claimant had resigned and had not been dismissed within section 95 ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Breach of section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999/right to be accompanied was upheld in respect of refusal of accompaniment at the disciplinary hearing on 12 November 2018. Remedy was reserved for a separate hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | Complaints of detriment and dismissal under section 12 Employment Relations Act 1999 were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The Tribunal found the claimant resigned with immediate effect and was not dismissed, so no entitlement to notice arose. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- section 10 Employment Relations Act 1999
- section 11 Employment Relations Act 1999
- section 12 Employment Relations Act 1999
- Toal & Hughes v GB Oils Ltd
- Roberts v GB Oils Ltd
- section 207A Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.