Case 2300801/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Hillyard v CNH2016 Ltd (In Liquidation) and 2 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300801/2018
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Balogun Dated
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr M Hillyard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a corrected judgment under Rule 69, correcting the judgment dated 30 July 2021. It concerns the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 21 June 2019, the claimant had been put on notice that an Employment Judge considered the claim to have no reasonable prospect of success for reasons set out in the first respondent's grounds of resistance. The claimant was told the claim would be struck out unless written representations were made before 4 July 2019. No written representations were received, and the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The specific substantive claim type against that respondent is not clear from the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 69
- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.