Case 2300806/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Ms Plant – HR Director — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300806/2019
- Decision date
- 15 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in London South on 10 January 2020, before Employment Judge Martin, the tribunal considered Miss Gina Isenberg's application to amend her existing claim to add race discrimination and sex discrimination. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Ms Plant, HR Director.
The tribunal refused the application to amend. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of either discrimination allegation, and it does not record any remedy award. The judgment was sent to the parties and entered in the register on 15 February 2020.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend her claim to include race discrimination; no merits determination was made. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend her claim to include sex discrimination; no merits determination was made. | Other | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.