Case 2300809/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. T Dickinson v Le Maître Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300809/2021
- Decision date
- 5 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. T Dickinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 25 February 2021. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined that a decision could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had breached its obligations under TULRCA. On that basis, it made a protective award of 90 days' pay in favour of Mrs T Dickinson, assessed at £5,904 gross.
The judgment records a single total award of £5,904. It also states that the claimant is responsible for any sums owed to HMRC in respect of tax or national insurance contributions.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal determined the claim under rule 21 because the respondent had failed to present a valid response on time. It found that the respondent had breached its obligations under TULRCA and ordered a protective award of 90 days' pay, assessed at £5,904 gross. | Upheld | — | £5,904 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,904
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.