Case 2300824/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Luard v Three Fifteen Holdings Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300824/2020
- Decision date
- 19 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Luard
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn this Rule 21 judgment dated 19 August 2020, Employment Judge Hyams-Parish recorded that Mr P Luard’s claims for a redundancy payment, unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract succeeded against Three Fifteen Holdings Ltd (In Liquidation). The judgment is a short summary order and does not set out detailed reasons beyond the outcome on those claims.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £11,287.50 by way of redundancy payment and £9,532.00 for unpaid wages, notice pay, holiday pay and sick pay. The judgment does not allocate the £9,532.00 between the unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract claims, and it records that the hearing listed for 5 March 2021 would not go ahead and was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £11,288 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awarded £9,532.00 for unpaid wages, notice pay, holiday pay and sick pay, but did not split that sum between this claim and breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awarded £9,532.00 for unpaid wages, notice pay, holiday pay and sick pay, but did not split that sum between this claim and unlawful deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,820
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.