Case 2300833/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Saka v Iknowa Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2300833/2022
- Decision date
- 29 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Andrews Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Saka
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 29 January 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim appeared not to have been actively pursued.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply by 05 February 2025. Employment Judge Andrews was satisfied that the Rule 38 grounds applied and that striking out the claim accorded with the overriding objective in Rule 3.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim is struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The specific claim type is taken from the listing category; the judgment does not give factual details. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim is struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The specific claim type is taken from the listing category; the judgment does not give factual details. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.