Case 2300844/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Jasmin McEwen v Global Hospitality Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300844/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados Representation
- Venue
- London South in public
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Jasmin McEwen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss McEwen brought claims for unpaid holiday, notice pay and arrears of pay, and also referred to unfair dismissal. The tribunal recorded that she did not have sufficient length of service for an unfair dismissal claim and had not responded to a letter of 21 March 2023 asking her to show cause why that claim should not be struck out.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claim included entitlement to unpaid holiday. The tribunal made no merits finding and dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after both parties failed to attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The reasons refer to a notice pay issue, but it was not separately addressed on the merits. The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 following non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim form referred to arrears of pay. The tribunal did not determine the substance of that claim and dismissed it under Rule 47. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal said the claimant did not have sufficient length of service for unfair dismissal and had not answered an earlier show-cause letter, but the final order dismissed the claim under Rule 47 after both parties failed to attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.