Case 2300857/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Did Not Attend – Email sent on 9 December 2019 at 18:36 For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300857/2019
- Decision date
- 7 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyde Dated
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Did Not Attend – Email sent on 9 December 2019 at 18:36 For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the open preliminary hearing before Employment Judge C Hyde sitting alone on 10 December 2019, the tribunal dealt with complaints of race and sex discrimination brought by Ms I Rudzate against SB Security Solutions Limited. The judgment records that the claimant did not attend; the respondent was represented by Ms R Owusu-Agyei, Counsel.
The tribunal struck out the complaints alleging race and sex discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 so far as they related to events up to 26 September 2018, as set out in numbered paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the details of claim attached to the claim form. The reason given was that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine those complaints having regard to section 123 of the Equality Act 2010.
No remedy was awarded. The judgment notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual post-hearing procedure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The complaint alleging race discrimination in relation to events up to 26 September 2018, as set out in numbered paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the claim details, was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine it having regard to section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The complaint alleging sex discrimination in relation to events up to 26 September 2018, as set out in numbered paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the claim details, was struck out because the tribunal had no jurisdiction to determine it having regard to section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 123 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.