Case 2300860/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Toki Tazwar v Italian Beer Connection Limited Sitting at: London South (by CVP) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300860/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tueje Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Toki Tazwar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim in the respondent's absence. The respondent's response form admitted that wages of £761.68 for December 2022 had not been paid, although it disputed that any further sums were due. The claimant confirmed that £761.68 was the amount claimed for unpaid wages and said it had not been paid.
The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from pay under Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 well-founded and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £761.68 deducted from the claimant's pay. The reasons also note that the claimant withdrew the separate claim for consequential financial loss, which was dismissed following withdrawal. Paragraph 7 of the reasons refers to £761.88, but the operative order is for £761.68.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's response admitted that wages of £761.68 for December 2022 had not been paid. The order states £761.68, but paragraph 7 of the reasons refers to £761.88, so the amount is recorded with lower confidence. | Upheld | — | £762 |
| Other | Claim for financial loss attributable to the unpaid wages. The claimant withdrew this claim; the judgment records it as dismissed following withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £762
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.