Case 2300865/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Faulkner v Canterbury Motoring World — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300865/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Faulkner
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone in Ashford on 4 October 2019, the tribunal held that Mr A Faulkner did not have the two years' service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. That claim was therefore dismissed.
The judgment also records that the claims for unlawful deduction of wages and other payments were dismissed upon withdrawal. The extracted text does not give any further detail about the substance of those claims or any separate findings on liability.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no remedy calculations are set out.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the Claimant did not have the 2 years' service required to bring an unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claims for unlawful deduction of wages and other payments were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The extracted text refers to 'other payments' but does not specify the legal basis for that part of the claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.