Mr P Szabo v EOS Pubs Limited — 2022

Case reference: 2300869/2019
Decision date: 25 March 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr P Szabo

Respondent

EOS Pubs Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This is a short Rule 52 judgment issued on 25 March 2022 by Legal Officer Ashley Goatham. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The extracted text does not set out any substantive findings on liability, breach of contract, unfair dismissal, or unlawful deductions from wages. It also does not identify the substantive claim type(s) beyond referring to “the claim” in the singular.

The decision notes that, because it was made by a Legal Officer, a party may apply in writing within 14 days for the decision to be considered afresh by an Employment Judge under regulation 10A(2).

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type in the extracted text. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.