Case 2300873/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Lambert (Solicitor) For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300873/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams-Parish
- Venue
- London South
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr M Lambert (Solicitor) For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 1 March 2021 before Employment Judge Hyams-Parish sitting alone. The tribunal recorded that the claim of unfair dismissal was well founded and succeeded.
The judgment awarded the claimant compensation equivalent to two weeks' pay, in the sum of £737.59. No separate breakdown between basic award and compensatory award was provided in the written record supplied here.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further findings or legal reasoning are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held the unfair dismissal claim was well founded and awarded compensation equivalent to two weeks' pay, totalling £737.59. | Upheld | — | £738 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £738
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £738
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.