Case 2300875/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Jones v Surbiton Food and Ale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2300875/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Andrews Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been entered by the respondent. The tribunal considered the claimant’s written submissions dated 16 June 2020 and found that the claims for unpaid redundancy pay, breach of contract and unpaid wages succeeded. The claim for unpaid expenses did not succeed because the tribunal found there was insufficient clarity as to any agreement reached between the parties.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared the claimant entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £1,050, payable through the insolvency fund rather than ordered against the respondent. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for unpaid notice pay, calculated as 3 months at £7,999.98 gross less £792 already paid. | Upheld | — | £7,208 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded unpaid wages of £327.35, described as 2 hours at £27.35 plus an agreed bonus of £300. | Upheld | — | £327 |
| Other | The claim for unpaid expenses was refused because there was insufficient clarity as to any agreement reached between the parties. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,535
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.