Case 2300882/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ashling Reid v Independent Catering Management Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300882/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Apted Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ashling Reid
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Apted sitting at London South Employment Tribunal on 23 November 2022 found that the claimant’s claims for constructive unfair dismissal and breach of contract were well founded and allowed. The judgment does not set out detailed reasons beyond that conclusion in the extracted text provided.
On remedy, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £1,105.45 in total. The award was broken down as a £600 basic award and a £505.45 compensatory award. No separate remedy was identified for the breach of contract claim, and no additional heads of loss are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for constructive unfair dismissal was well founded and allowed. The remedy was stated as a single total sum, not split between claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was well founded and allowed. No separate monetary figure was identified for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,105
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £600
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £505
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.