Case 2300883/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Agbi v Central and Cecil Housing Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300883/2019
- Decision date
- 2 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Siddall RULE
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Agbi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South on 2 September 2019, Employment Judge Siddall RULE 52 recorded that Mr T Agbi's claim against Central and Cecil Housing Trust was dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not set out any liability findings or separate reasoning on the underlying claims.
No monetary award is recorded. The judgment is a short procedural disposal reflecting withdrawal rather than a determination of the merits.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal and does not record separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal and does not record separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal and does not record separate merits findings. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.