Case 2300895/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Asaf v Imani's Beauty Bar — 2022
- Case reference
- 2300895/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wright Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Asaf
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss J Asaf presented a claim against Imani's Beauty Bar, issued in the London South Employment Tribunals on 08 March 2022. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £823.00 gross. The judgment also states that the respondent must pay the claimant £823.00 in total.
The hearing listed for 14 October 2022 was cancelled. No other claims, legal tests, or separate remedy components are identified in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determination was made under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £823 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £823
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.