Case 2300899/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Barreto v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2300899/2019
- Decision date
- 13 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Ashford
- Venue
- Ashford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Barreto
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing by telephone on 13 June 2019 before Employment Judge Corrigan sitting alone. The claimant, Miss L Barreto, did not appear. The respondent, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, was represented by Ms Owusu-Agyei, Counsel.
The only substantive order recorded in the extracted judgment is that the claimant’s claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No reasons are given in the short text for any substantive liability finding, and no monetary award is recorded.
The extracted judgment does not include any panel members or any further findings beyond the dismissal order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not identify the legal basis of the claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case classifies it as unlawful deduction from wages. The judgment records that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at a preliminary hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.