Case 2300904/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Molyneux v Royal Mail Group Ltd Heard by video — 2023
- Case reference
- 2300904/2022
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Corrigan Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Molyneux
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 26 June 2023 before Employment Judge Corrigan, the tribunal dealt with a health and safety detriment complaint under section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and a sex discrimination complaint. The health and safety detriment complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The sex discrimination complaint was struck out. The written record says that although the claimant had ticked the sex discrimination box in claim 2, no sex discrimination claims arising from the dates covered by that claim form were being actively pursued. The tribunal also refused the application to include sex discrimination claims that did not relate to the date covered by that claim form.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Health & Safety detriment complaint under s.44 Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The claimant had ticked the sex discrimination box in claim 2, but the tribunal recorded that no sex discrimination claims arising from the dates covered by that claim form were being actively pursued and refused the application to include sex discrimination claims outside that date range. | Struck out | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.