Case 2300905/2020 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr P Burridge (Director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300905/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Webster Appearances
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the London South Employment Tribunal on 9 February 2021, Employment Judge Webster heard claims brought by Mr Martin against Boxed Freeze Ltd and Coolertech Ltd. The tribunal upheld the claims against Boxed Freeze Ltd for statutory redundancy payment, notice pay, unpaid wages, holiday pay, unauthorised deductions in respect of pension contributions, and compensation for failure to provide a written statement of terms. The claim against Coolertech Ltd was not upheld because the tribunal found it was not the claimant's employer.
The award was expressed in gross terms. Boxed Freeze Ltd was ordered to pay £1,140 redundancy pay, £760 notice pay, £1,672 unpaid wages, £228 holiday pay, £444.60 for pension contribution deductions, and £1,520 for failure to provide a written statement of terms, with the judgment recording a total of £5,764.50. The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,140 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | £760 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £1,672 |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay was itemised separately in the remedy table. | Upheld | — | £228 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions in respect of employee pension contributions; the extracted figures record this head as £444.60 and the judgment's stated total award as £5,764.50. | Upheld | — | £445 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of terms contrary to s1 Employment Rights Act 1996 / s38 ERA 1996. | Upheld | — | £1,520 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,765
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s38 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.